Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 48–59. Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. "I-Messages and you-messages." Beyond Intractability. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(1), 78–94. Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 85–99. Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution. M., Olekalns, M., Friedman, R., Goates, N., Anderson, C., & Lisco, C. Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Journal of Management Development, 24(3), 197–208. A gender-based categorization for conflict resolution. How bullying language can be disguised as an “I-statement”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103. Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 80–96. How can women escape the compensation negotiation dilemma? Relational accounts are one answer. Paper Presented at the Frontiers in Education, Indianopolis, IN, 2005, T3D–T1. Graduation rates, grade-point average, and changes of major of female and minority students entering engineering. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(1), 26–45. Owning your emotions: Reactions to expressions of self-versus other-attributed positive and negative emotions. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 16683. Measuring conflict expression: A complementary approach to understanding conflict. R., Bendersky, C., Bear, J., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(4), 213–231. Gender and the emotional experience of relationship conflict: The differential effectiveness of avoidant conflict management. Meta-analyses of gender effects on conversational interruption: Who, what, when, where, and how. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110–122. Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much… or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Training students and professionals to use PFF conflict resolution strategies has the potential to increase women’s visibility in situations where they currently remain silent and to improve overall team dynamics in ways that challenge gender stereotypes.Īdler, R. Results demonstrated that conflict responses based on the PFF script led to significantly better impressions and outcomes for both men and women protagonists compared to responses based on I-focused statements. Engineering students ( N = 289, Study 2 N = 279, Study 3) viewed three conflict scenarios with different response strategies and rated their impressions of the protagonist and the likelihood of a satisfactory outcome. In two follow-up experimental studies, we compared the PFF script to popular psychology advice that encourages individuals to foreground their personal feelings with I-focused statements. This PFF script balances communality and agency by pointing out positives, foregrounding group goals, focusing on solutions, and avoiding emotion. We inductively coded these responses to develop a positive, future-focused (PFF) script for responding to conflict that minimized gender backlash. In Study 1, we interviewed 29 experienced women engineers and had them read scenarios of common team conflicts and describe the exact words they would use (and the words they would avoid using) to respond in these conflicts. This paper presents three studies that examine how women can respond to conflict in assertive ways that obtain their desired result without harm to their competence and likability, thus minimizing gender backlash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |